PEA Update 2 : “Thinking politically” – PEA framing and tools

This blog forms part of a series of internal Political Economy Analysis (PEA) updates compiled by Priya Chattier/Tara Davda, with general wisdom by Graham Teskey and Lavinia Tyrrel. Thanks to Leisa Gibson (and Priya) for GESI support. We will aim to publish these every fortnight or so. Watch this space.

It’s all about the framing

A major critique of PEA has been that it highlights constraints to aid effectiveness without necessarily offering solutions. To be relevant and actionable, political analysis needs to identify tangible entry points, and be integrated into programming right from the design stage. In this way, PEA is best conceived not as a one-off consultancy input or study, but as an internal, transformative process to encourage donor officials to ‘think and work politically’ every day. 

The PEA discourse notes that for programs to be operationally relevant, PEA analytical frameworks draw from upon a mix of analytical tools to better understand how politics and economics intersect to solve a particular development problem by designing and implementing politically responsive programs. 

PEA has to date largely ignored the politics of gender, exclusion and power, and this is slowly changing. Gender analysis is an intersectional examination of how power is distributed between women, girls, men, boys and other genders, and who can use that power to influence and control policy, systems and outcomes. The majority of political, social and economic systems exclude women and girls – particularly those from certain ethnic and racial groups as well as those with disabilities –  from power structures. This fundamentally affects the way that power is distributed and used. Its essential that gender and social inclusion be considered in PEA, and that we adapt existing tools to this end.

PEA is a formal process, but also a way of understanding why change is happening (or not happening). To think politically, one must understand the political economy environment at the country level, i.e., the drivers of change– structure, institutions and agency

PEA can be conducted at various levels – see here

  • Sector level PEA studies, see also this Briefing Note by Teskey et al on how PEA to education and health sector programming is applied in 13 Countries in Asia, Africa and the Pacific.

Critical first step in a PEA is defining the problem, led by local actors.

What tools are out there to help us conduct a PEA?

  • PEA checklist for development programs – here
  • Sample PEA interview Q’s – here
  • Note taking template- here

Challenges to conducting PEA:

Finally – suggest you print off the DLP ‘Everyday Political Analysis’ seven page brief and keep it by your desk. If you do you will be doing PEA every day…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s